New York State Legal professional General Letitia James in New York City, November 19, 2019.
Lucas Jackson | Reuters
Former President Donald Trump questioned a decide to reject New York Attorney General Letitia James’ bid to keep him in contempt for allegedly failing to comply with a subpoena as aspect of a civil investigation into his business.
A attorney for Trump argued in a court docket submitting Tuesday that the previous president complied with James’ subpoena when his lawful team told her that he will not have any of the files she asked for.
“After conducting a diligent look for and evaluate, Respondent’s counsel established that Respondent was not in possession of any paperwork responsive to the Subpoena and that all potentially responsive files were being in the possession, custody or handle of the Trump Corporation,” Trump’s legal professional Alina Habba wrote.
James is investigating allegations that the Trump Organization misstated the values of some of its actual estate belongings to get better monetary phrases when applying for financial loans and insurance policy and for tax reasons.
New York Supreme Court docket Choose Arthur Engoron in February denied requests by Trump, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. to throw out subpoenas issued to them by James.
Engoron also ordered Trump to “comply in comprehensive” with a subpoena for him to deliver extra paperwork and information and facts to the investigators.
James on April 7 urged the judge to hold Trump in contempt of court, accusing the former president of violating the court’s get. She also questioned Engoron to slap Trump with a high-quality of $10,000 each working day till he turns around the files.
“The judge’s get was crystal distinct: Donald J. Trump should comply with our subpoena and flip over appropriate files to my office environment,” James claimed in a assertion at the time.
“In its place of obeying a courtroom buy, Mr. Trump is making an attempt to evade it. We are trying to get the court’s rapid intervention for the reason that no just one is earlier mentioned the law,” James reported.
Engoron is scheduled to listen to oral arguments about the contempt dispute Monday afternoon.
In the court submitting Tuesday evening, Trump’s law firm speculated that the attorney general’s business office filed the contempt motion “seemingly in an effort to change this issue into a public spectacle.”
Habba wrote that Trump followed the subpoena’s directions. She argued that Trump was not expected to provide any files to the investigators that have been in the Trump Organization’s possession, if people information experienced already been produced to James’ office.
“This provision is critical since the Trump Business has independently created a extensive variety of paperwork to the [attorney general’s office] through the program of the subject investigation,” Habba wrote.
She also accused the lawyer general’s place of work of refusing “to engage in very good-faith conversations to handle the troubles at hand.”
Given that “recalcitrant habits, it is good to dilemma [the attorney general’s] motive in bringing the instantaneous software, which appears to be very little a lot more than a contrived publicity stunt,” Habba wrote.